A story is more
than a headline.

Know who reviewed the story.

Moon’s automated editor can publish routine official statistics, space updates and product announcements after checking the original sources, dates, attribution and each part of the story. These stories carry an automated-review label and the time their evidence was checked. This is AI review, not a human sign-off or a guarantee of accuracy. Sensitive subjects and unresolved evidence stay in review. Picture reuse and context still require human approval in this first phase; a story can be published without a photograph.

If something is wrong, use the story’s feedback control. Corrections retain a dated change note.

Start with the event.

Several articles can describe the same event. Moon brings the context together so you can spend your time understanding, rather than assembling the pieces.

Keep the evidence in reach.

Claims point to their sources. A primary document tells us what its author reported; it does not automatically settle every question. Links sharing an origin do not count as independent confirmation.

Leave room for uncertainty.

Supported facts, developing claims and documented disagreements have different meanings. We keep those distinctions visible and preserve change notes when stories are corrected.

Your interests are a beginning.

For you gives priority to the topics and region you choose while keeping other perspectives available. It currently uses those explicit choices, not an opaque prediction about who you are.